Capture one vs lightroom fuji
LR seems a bit more dramatic than C1 and actually I feel it looks more “busy”. Standard LR settings (right), Fuji Jpeg (left)Īdobe’s approach (with standard settings) seems a tad closer to Fuji’s idea of sharpening. STANDARD IMPORT SETTINGS Standard Capture One vs Fuji Jpeg In Capture One’s case it’s the “generic” profile, which I found previously is a very good match for the Provia Jpegs from Fuji. However, how about sharpness/details in a landscape style shot?įor all the test shots a “Provia” profile is used. In part one we found that both C1 (with custom profiles) and LR (with built in profiles) can match Fuji COLOURS almost perfectly (or so close it hardly matters). In reality, if a RAW processor can do as good or better than the Fuji jpegs, then it’s a winner. I’ll be using a SOOC jpeg as my base/control. I will be comparing different sharpening techniques and settings to see which RAW converter is best. This amazingly super artistic test shot (ok I’ll admit, it’s just taken out of my window). So let’s get on with it already! Test shot: So I decided in part II of LR vs C1, I would make it about trees and all that stuff. Things like trees, grass and even cityscapes just don’t have those fine details as easily as with a bayer sensor. However, one area I’ve had trouble with in the past with Fuji files and Lightroom is landscape style shots.
My conclusion was “both are good in their own way” (well not in those words perhaps, but pretty much). In PART ONE of our adventure, I looked at a fairly genetic test shot of some objects of various colours.